Indian Population in New Hampshire by City : 2025 Ranking & Insights
The Indian population in New Hampshire totals 11,583, according to recent U.S. Census estimates. Leading cities include Nashua (4,169), followed by Manchester (793) and Salem town (680), each hosting visible segments of the community. While these urban centers anchor much of the population, the statewide total points to a broader presence in unincorporated areas and smaller towns beyond major city boundaries. The analysis below explores how Indian residents are distributed across New Hampshire''s urban and rural landscape.
Read more
Top 5 cities with the largest Indian population in New Hampshire
-
1NashuaIndian population in Nashua is 4,1694.57% of Nashua population is Indian
-
2ManchesterIndian population in Manchester is 7930.69% of Manchester population is Indian
-
3Salem townIndian population in Salem town is 6802.22% of Salem town population is Indian
-
4Windham townIndian population in Windham town is 6313.96% of Windham town population is Indian
-
5Bedford townIndian population in Bedford town is 5252.23% of Bedford town population is Indian
Overview of Indian population in New Hampshire
- Population Count and Percentage: American Community Survey data indicate New Hampshire contains 11,583 Indian residents (0.83% of 1.4 million total state population), positioning the state at the 29th percentile nationally among U.S. states for Indian population concentrations.
- Comparison to State and National Averages: U.S. Census surveys show New Hampshire's Indian demographic representation of 0.83% remains below the national average of 1.5%, positioning the state below typical U.S. demographic distribution patterns.
- Share of Total National Population: Official American Community Survey data indicates New Hampshire contains 11,583 Indian residents, representing less than 1% of the nation's total Indian population of 4.9 million, constituting a minimal fraction of the national demographic community relative to the state's overall population size.
- Population Density per Square Mile: U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey data indicates New Hampshire maintains 1.3 Indian Americans per square mile, marginally below the national average of 1.4 per square mile, placing the state near national demographic representation levels.
- Need additional overviews? Extended research data available for purchase and license. ➔
216 Cities in New Hampshire Ranked by Indian Population
American Community Survey data [1] show Indian population in New Hampshire present in Nashua, Manchester, and Salem town, along with several other incorporated cities reporting non-zero populations. The table below provides broader statistics, including total population figures, density measures, and demographic distributions based on current ACS data for all incorporated cities included in this analysis*.
Rank by Indian Population |
City |
Indian Population |
% of Total City Population |
% of Total New Hampshire Indian Population |
5 Year Rank Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nashua | 4,169 | 4.57% | 35.99% | |
| 2 | Manchester | 793 | 0.69% | 6.85% | |
| 3 | Salem town | 680 | 2.22% | 5.87% | |
| 4 | Windham town | 631 | 3.96% | 5.45% | |
| 5 | Bedford town | 525 | 2.23% | 4.53% | |
| 6 | Merrimack town | 421 | 1.52% | 3.63% | |
| 7 | Hanover town | 371 | 3.17% | 3.20% | |
| 8 | 345 | 1.54% | 2.98% | ||
| 9 | 327 | 1.28% | 2.82% | ||
| 10 | 271 | 0.61% | 2.34% | ||
| 11 | 239 | 1.59% | 2.06% | ||
| 12 | 208 | 0.63% | 1.80% | ||
| 13 | 179 | 0.54% | 1.55% | ||
| 14 | 174 | 1.18% | 1.50% | ||
| 15 | 167 | 3.66% | 1.44% | ||
| 16 | 159 | 2.04% | 1.37% | ||
| 17 | 154 | 2.27% | 1.33% | ||
| 18 | 149 | 0.43% | 1.29% | ||
| 19 | 143 | 0.88% | 1.23% | ||
| 20 | 129 | 1.28% | 1.11% | ||
| 21 | 90 | 1.25% | 0.78% | ||
| 22 | 83 | 2.11% | 0.72% | ||
| 23 | 82 | 0.31% | 0.71% | ||
| 24 | 71 | 0.96% | 0.61% | ||
| 24 | 71 | 0.86% | 0.61% | ||
| 25 | 70 | 0.38% | 0.60% | ||
| 26 | 64 | 0.40% | 0.55% | ||
| 27 | 62 | 0.43% | 0.54% | ||
| 28 | 56 | 0.24% | 0.48% | ||
| 29 | 55 | 1.23% | 0.47% | ||
| 30 | 50 | 1.13% | 0.43% | ||
| 31 | 47 | 0.83% | 0.41% | ||
| 32 | 46 | 1.13% | 0.40% | ||
| 33 | 43 | 0.46% | 0.37% | ||
| 34 | 41 | 0.48% | 0.35% | ||
| 35 | 40 | 1.05% | 0.35% | ||
| 36 | 36 | 0.90% | 0.31% | ||
| 37 | 26 | 1.18% | 0.22% | ||
| 37 | 26 | 0.91% | 0.22% | ||
| 38 | 23 | 0.58% | 0.20% | ||
| 39 | 22 | 0.49% | 0.19% | ||
| 40 | 21 | 0.25% | 0.18% | ||
| 41 | 20 | 0.30% | 0.17% | ||
| 42 | 17 | 0.10% | 0.15% | ||
| 43 | 15 | 2.15% | 0.13% | ||
| 44 | 14 | 0.09% | 0.12% | ||
| 45 | 11 | 0.27% | 0.10% | ||
| 45 | 11 | 0.62% | 0.10% | ||
| 45 | 11 | 0.63% | 0.10% | ||
| 45 | 11 | 1.28% | 0.10% | ||
| 46 | 10 | 0.31% | 0.09% | ||
| 46 | 10 | 0.60% | 0.09% | ||
| 46 | 10 | 1.08% | 0.09% | ||
| 47 | 8 | 0.08% | 0.07% | ||
| 48 | 7 | 0.47% | 0.06% | ||
| 48 | 7 | 0.29% | 0.06% | ||
| 48 | 7 | 0.18% | 0.06% | ||
| 49 | 6 | 0.67% | 0.05% | ||
| 49 | 6 | 0.40% | 0.05% | ||
| 49 | 6 | 0.24% | 0.05% | ||
| 50 | 5 | 0.24% | 0.04% | ||
| 50 | 5 | 0.24% | 0.04% | ||
| 50 | 5 | 0.22% | 0.04% | ||
| 51 | 4 | 0.06% | 0.03% | ||
| 52 | 3 | 0.15% | 0.03% | ||
| 53 | 2 | 0.06% | 0.02% | ||
| 53 | 2 | 0.21% | 0.02% | ||
| 54 | 1 | 0.01% | 0.01% | ||
| 54 | 1 | 0.05% | 0.01% | ||
| 54 | 1 | 0.02% | 0.01% | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - | ||
| 55 | 0 | - | - |
Methodology
This ranking list is based on data from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. The ACS is one of the most reliable sources for understanding population trends across different locations, and it provides estimates for various racial and ethnic groups at city, county, state and all geography levels down to the Census block group.
This list ranks city in New Hampshire by their Indian population, using the most recent ACS data available.
How the Census defines Indian population
The U.S. Census Bureau allows people to self-identify their ancestry, meaning individuals can write upto ancestries when responding to the survey. In this ranking, we include everyone who identifies as having Indian ancestry, whether alone or in combination with another ancestry.
Here are a few important things to know about how ancestry is reported:
- Some people identify as Indian alone, while others identify as Indian along with another race (such as Indian and German).
- We’ve used the “Indian alone or in any combination” category unless noted otherwise, which gives a broader picture of the Indian population in each area.
How We Ranked the Data
This ranking is based on the total number of people who identified as Indian alone or in combination in city. To provide additional context, we’ve also included two key percentages:
- % of Total City Population – This shows what percentage of the total state population identifies as Indian .
- % of Total New Hampshire Indian Population – This tells us how much of the entire U.S. Indian population lives in that state.
To keep things simple, all population numbers have been rounded to the nearest whole number, and percentages are rounded to one decimal place. Because of rounding, some percentages may not add up to exactly 100%.
Things to Keep in Mind
Like all survey-based data, ACS estimates come with some limitations. Here are a few things to be aware of:
- In places with very small Indian populations, the numbers may not be reported at all due to privacy protections or sampling variability in the survey.
- Since the ACS is based on a sample, the numbers are estimates, not exact counts. That means they may slightly differ from other sources like the decennial U.S. Census.
- City that don’t have any reported Indian population are not included in the ranking but are listed separately below for reference.
This ranking is meant to provide a clear, data-driven look at where Indian populations are most concentrated while keeping the numbers easy to understand.
Sources
- U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
- U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefiles 2023.
Thank you for your interest.
If your inquiry is urgent, please email us directly at customrequests@neilsberg.com
Please note: while we appreciate your questions, we may not be able to respond to all inquiries.